• Forums
    • Public Forums
      • Community Connect
      • Dynatrace
        • Dynatrace Open Q&A
      • Application Monitoring & UEM
        • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
      • Network Application Monitoring
        • NAM Open Q&A
  • Home /
  • Public Forums /
  • Application Monitoring & UEM /
  • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A /
avatar image
Question by Tzaci S. · Jun 25, 2015 at 08:40 PM ·

How to break one big PP into few small PP

Hi

We have some trouble with braking down one big Pure Path that start with "processImpl" into few Pure Path every time we find "process".

 

We define new sensor group called "ForceStartPP" with the 2 methods

 

and mark them with "Active and start new PP" in the sensor configuration part of the agent group

 

But we didn’t get the result we asked for (another small Pure Paths for every call of "process".

We tried to put the method "process" in different sensor group with higher priority , and also to switch the "active" to "active and start a new Pure Path" in the Sensor group and few other combination and didn’t had any successes.

The only way we got Pure Paths for the process method was when we made the  "processImpl" inactive.

We also noticed that each Asynchronous invocation is started on a different thread..

Any help is appreciated J

Our version is "6.0.0.7153"

Attach  is a stored session.

yosin@matrix.co.il

 

Tzaci & Yos

 

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

2 Replies

  • Sort: 
  • Most voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
avatar image

Answer by Rick B. · Jun 26, 2015 at 01:14 AM

The behavior you're experiencing is by design, if there is already an active PurePath then it will not generate new ones downstream.  You have two options:

  • Set the sensor which defines "ProcessImpl" inactive (you've done that and know what the trade-offs are)
  • Set the Thread Tagging sensor inactive.  This will not only disable thread tagging for this type of transaction but all transactions which trace on this Agent Group.  If you look at your other PurePaths and find that you don't need to trace across threads then it is safe to disable this sensor.  With your created "active and Start PurePaths" rule you will get a separate PurePath for the parent processImpl and all its children process() calls

Does that help?

Rick B

 

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

avatar image

Answer by Tzaci S. · Jun 25, 2015 at 08:45 PM

Amdocs SB AO ProcessImpl.dts

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

How to get started

First steps in the forum
Read Community User Guide
Best practices of using forum

NAM 2019 SP5 is available


Check the RHEL support added in the latest NAM service pack.

Learn more

LIVE WEBINAR

"Performance Clinic - Monitoring as a Self Service with Dynatrace"


JANUARY 15, 3:00 PM GMT / 10:00 AM ET

Register here

Follow this Question

Answers Answers and Comments

3 People are following this question.

avatar image avatar image avatar image

Forum Tags

dotnet mobile monitoring load iis 6.5 kubernetes mainframe rest api dashboard framework 7.0 appmon 7 health monitoring adk log monitoring services auto-detection uem webserver test automation license web performance monitoring ios nam probe collector migration mq web services knowledge sharing reports window java hybris javascript appmon sensors good to know extensions search 6.3+ server documentation easytravel web dashboard kibana system profile purelytics docker splunk 6.1 process groups account 7.2 rest dynatrace saas spa guardian appmon administration production user actions postgresql upgrade oneagent measures security Dynatrace Managed transactionflow technologies diagnostics user session monitoring unique users continuous delivery sharing configuration alerting NGINX splitting business transaction client 6.3 installation database scheduler apache mobileapp RUM php dashlet azure purepath agent 7.1 appmonsaas messagebroker nodejs 6.2 android sensor performance warehouse
  • Forums
  • Public Forums
    • Community Connect
    • Dynatrace
      • Dynatrace Open Q&A
    • Application Monitoring & UEM
      • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
    • Network Application Monitoring
      • NAM Open Q&A