• Forums
    • Public Forums
      • Community Connect
      • Dynatrace
        • Dynatrace Open Q&A
      • Application Monitoring & UEM
        • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
      • Network Application Monitoring
        • NAM Open Q&A
        • Enterprise Synthetic Monitoring
      • Synthetic Classic
        • Synthetic Classic Open Q&A
      • BSM Open Q&A
  • Home /
  • Public Forums /
  • Application Monitoring & UEM /
  • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A /
avatar image
Question by Jose I. · Oct 02, 2012 at 10:53 AM · web performance monitoring

What is the Browser JavaScript?

Hi.

In the transaction flow, appears one agent group called Browser JavaScript and I need to confirm... Is the execution time of the JS Agent of dT in the Browser? If it is, could you help me to explain why is the 75% of the transaction time in this example?

Thanks!

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0
10 |2000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

3 Replies

· Add your reply
  • Sort: 
  • Most voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
avatar image

Answer by Klaus E. · Oct 02, 2012 at 04:43 PM

Hi,

The Browser tier shows you the time spent in the Browser which is the Client time of the Page Action duration. If you have not turned on bandwidth calculation this also contains some network time. If it is turned on this can be because of long running JavaScripts, Third Party,...

Klaus

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users
avatar image

Answer by Jose I. · Oct 02, 2012 at 05:46 PM

Hi, Klaus.

Thanks for your answer. I've asked that, because this data are from a POV where the customer generated traffic with loadrunner sessions. the issue that I've is that the visit time with the dT agents is 20% higher than the same visits without the dT agents. Checking the transactions with dT, the 72% of the time is invested on browser... so does it possible that this is because loadrunner doesn't use real browsers? Is it possible an incompatibility with our web agent and the browser that use loadrunner?

Thanks in advance and best regards.

JMI

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 1 · Share
10 |2000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users
avatar image Klaus E. &. · Oct 03, 2012 at 03:35 PM 0
Share

Hi Jose,

This is hard to say. There can be several reasons and what you stated can have an effect. I am not an expert on Loadrunner and how it works.

Klaus

avatar image

Answer by Ryan C. · Oct 03, 2012 at 06:40 PM

I'm not sure how reliable UEM will be with LoadRunner. UEM was designed for production monitoring of real users with real browsers such a IE, Firefox, etc. LoadRunner is a different animal.

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Your answer

Hint: You can notify a user about this post by typing @username

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 52.4 MB each and 262.1 MB total.

Welcome to the
Dynatrace Community Forums

Check out the Forum User Guide and Forum Guidelines to learn how to get started.

Community Member of the Month
February 2019

Announcing Dynatrace's Community Member of the Month for February 2019, Larry R.! Click here to read more!

Employee Member of the Month
February 2019

Announcing Dynatrace's Employee Member of the Month for February 2019, Dave M.! Click here to read more!

Live webinar: AIOps done right through enhanced Dynatrace AI root cause detection

Learn the enhanced capabilities of the next generation Dynatrace AI root cause analysis and how to feed it with your own data sources.
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Register today!

Live webinar: AIOps done right through enhanced Dynatrace AI root cause detection

Learn the enhanced capabilities of the next generation Dynatrace AI root cause analysis and how to feed it with your own data sources.
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Register today!

NAM 2019 Beta is available

Would you like to have an early taste of what we have cooked up for 2019? We would love to hear your feedback and improve some of the new features. Check NAM 2019 Beta release notes.
Sign up today!

Follow this Question

Answers Answers and Comments

2 People are following this question.

avatar image avatar image

Related Questions

Auto-instrumentation of Android APKs not monitoring web calls; renaming apps 5 Answers

Mapping agents for multiple IIS Web Server agents on a single machine? 3 Answers

Welcome to the Web Performance and Experience Management Forum 5 Answers

Display the Infomation on Dashboard. 1 Answer

UEM Support for jQuery CallBacks 1 Answer

Forum Tags

nginx java dotnet docker 6.5 ios customization knowledge sharing browser agent mobileapp sensor chart 7.1 hybris 6.3+ production incidents Dynatrace Managed php javascript processes monitoring nodejs uem splunk license framework good to know installation web services plugin splitting rest webserver reports 7.0 kubernetes errors rum mainframe 6.1 account configuration forum user guide security web dashboard agent load window oneagent upgrade diagnostics search scheduler appmonsaas log analytics database performance warehouse services web performance monitoring user sessions test automation transactionflow measures business transaction migration plugins android dashlet server purelytics 6.2 rest api system profile appmon appmon 7 mobile monitoring collector adk messagebroker purepath apache guardian appmon iis 7.2 dashboard mq kibana client continuous delivery unique users postgresql sensors documentation alerting auto-detection 6.3 administration
  • Forums
  • Public Forums
    • Community Connect
    • Dynatrace
      • Dynatrace Open Q&A
    • Application Monitoring & UEM
      • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
    • Network Application Monitoring
      • NAM Open Q&A
      • Enterprise Synthetic Monitoring
    • Synthetic Classic
      • Synthetic Classic Open Q&A
    • BSM Open Q&A