Show PurePath total count and count above threshold
I'm not sure what I'm attempting is possible or that I'm even on the right track here, but I have a client who wants to see the total count of a PurePath and also the amount out of the total that breached their 5 second threshold for these. In the example below, there were 11 PurePaths where the total response time was > 5s, out of a total of 182 PurePaths.
I'm using method invocation in a BT to track the nr of PurePaths where this method occurs and I get the total count, I'm just not sure how I would count the 'failed' (11 over 5000ms) and 'successful' (171 under 5000ms) and display either all three values in a table, or at least the Total (182) and Failed (11). I was thinking of creating a splitting to do this but I don't see a way to do that. Any suggestions would be most helpful!
I guess I would need understand the objective Is it total transaction time for all purepaths, some purepath transactions, or are you looking for execution time of a method within the purepath?
I have built the measures/BT's and defined them to a dashboard that will breakdown purepaths by response time(SLA). I just used pure path response time and not a specific method.
Green LT 3000
Yellow GT 4000 LT 8000
Red > GT 8000
I could have used a filter to only include key business transactions(purepaths), but in this case I am looking at all of them
Thanks for your reply and suggestions Jerry.
The objective is to report on the nr of Purepaths vs. nr of Purepaths which exceeded Response Time of 5000ms, i.e. 182 Purepaths (which contain the specific method I'm tracking in those Purepaths) total vs. total out of the 182 who's response time exceeds 5s. The client only wants the total values, they're not interested in charts.
My problem is that my current configuration uses the thresholds for the Method Exec Time which I've created a measure for and the result is that it only reports those Purepaths where the Method breached the 5000ms threshold, ignoring the Response Time of the Purepath.
I hope the above makes sense.
