• Forums
    • Public Forums
      • Community Connect
      • Dynatrace
        • Dynatrace Open Q&A
      • Application Monitoring & UEM
        • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
      • Network Application Monitoring
        • NAM Open Q&A
        • Enterprise Synthetic Monitoring
      • Synthetic Classic
        • Synthetic Classic Open Q&A
  • Home /
  • Public Forums /
  • Application Monitoring & UEM /
  • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A /
avatar image
Question by Harish P. · Sep 27, 2018 at 11:39 AM · 6.5 business transaction measures sensors

Business Transaction misleading data capture in AppMon 6.5

incorrect-captured-hit.pngHi Team,

We have created a business transaction based on method argument in which first parameter of the argument is IP and second is port.We need to create BT which gives us count of transactions on that particular IP and port.
Let us consider one scenario in which we created two measures based on method argument value :
Method name : getProccessSocket()
First method argument : xxx.xx.81.246 (measure 1)
Second method argument : 5165 (measure 2)
So the business transaction made by adding measure 1 and measure 2 with logically AND condition should be capable of capturing all hits having method getProccessSocket() invoked with IP xxx.xx.81.246 and port 5165.
Also note that method getProccessSocket() is occurring multiple times in a single pure path with different IPs and ports. Hence the above mentioned BT is also capturing incorrect data with method getProccessSocket() having IP xxx.xx.81.246 and port 5161 in its first occurrence and IP xxx.xx.81.179 and port 5165 in its second occurrence in same pure path.
The above mentioned BT works properly when method getProccessSocket() invoked with only once per pure path. If getProccessSocket() invoked multiple times in a single pure path then BT captures all hits with different IP and port combination.

Please suggest us to resolve the problem.

Kindly find below snap of incorrectly captured hit.

incorrect-captured-hit.png (97.1 kB)
Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
â–¼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 52.4 MB each and 262.1 MB total.

4 Replies

  • Sort: 
  • Most voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
avatar image

Answer by Harish P. · Oct 03, 2018 at 09:35 AM

Hi @Babar Q.

Thanks for your valuable inputs.
Please find below snap which contains method getproccessSocket() occurring twice in a single pure path. First occurrence contains IP xxx.xx.153.132 and port 4001 whereas second occurrence contains IP xxx.xx.81.246 and port 5165. If we create BT with 'Only analyses first occurrence per pure path' then it will check only first occurrence whereas the required IP and port comes in a second occurrence.purepath-with-two-ip-port.png


purepath-with-two-ip-port.png (62.6 kB)
Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
â–¼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 52.4 MB each and 262.1 MB total.

avatar image

Answer by Babar Q. · Oct 01, 2018 at 10:37 AM

Hello @Harish P.

Did you try with the checkbox 'Only analyze first method occurrence per PurePath' in the business transaction?

Regards,

Babar

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
â–¼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 52.4 MB each and 262.1 MB total.

avatar image

Answer by Harish P. · Oct 01, 2018 at 10:03 AM

Thanks @Kyle K. We tried this but it doesn't works in our case.

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
â–¼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 52.4 MB each and 262.1 MB total.

avatar image

Answer by Kyle K. · Sep 27, 2018 at 11:48 PM

I think this is a symptom of misunderstanding how a BT is created. BTs are always calculated per purepath so that is why when you only have invocation of the method it works and otherwise it doesn't, unfortunately I'm not sure of a good solution with in App Mon itself. The one thing I would look at trying is calculating the number of invocations for each splitting and that may get you closer to the numbers you are looking for.

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
â–¼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 52.4 MB each and 262.1 MB total.

Join the conversation!

First steps in the forum
Community User Guide

LIVE WEBINAR

"Power Demo: Software Intelligence for Cloud Infrastructure"


DECEMBER 12, 10:00 AM GMT / 2:00 PM ET

Register here

Live webinar: Ensuring Digital Business Availability with Dynatrace

Learn how Dynatrace Real User Monitoring automatically detects errors that impact your end users caused by erroneous 3rd party or CDNs.
December 10, 4:00 pm CET / 10:00 am ET
Register here

Live webinar: Ensuring Digital Business Availability with Dynatrace

Learn how Dynatrace Real User Monitoring automatically detects errors that impact your end users caused by erroneous 3rd party or CDNs.
December 10, 4:00 pm CET / 10:00 am ET
Register here

Live webinar: Ensuring Digital Business Availability with Dynatrace

Learn how Dynatrace Real User Monitoring automatically detects errors that impact your end users caused by erroneous 3rd party or CDNs.
December 10, 4:00 pm CET / 10:00 am ET
Register here

Follow this Question

Answers Answers and Comments

33 People are following this question.

avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image avatar image

Related Questions

Can you create a measure from a Bind Value in a SQL statement? 1 Answer

API splitting for only webrequest within purepath 1 Answer

How to ignore async on ProcessRequestNotificationHelper Purepath 0 Answers

Can a measure or business transaction capture database time for a specific method execution? 1 Answer

Spliting by Query String 1 Answer

Forum Tags

dotnet mobile monitoring load iis 6.5 kubernetes mainframe rest api errors dashboard framework 7.0 appmon 7 health monitoring adk log monitoring services auto-detection uem webserver test automation license web performance monitoring ios nam probe collector migration mq web services knowledge sharing reports window java browser agent community user guide hybris javascript appmon sensors good to know search 6.3+ server documentation easytravel web dashboard kibana system profile purelytics docker splunk 6.1 process groups account 7.2 rest dynatrace saas spa guardian appmon administration production user actions postgresql upgrade oneagent measures security Dynatrace Managed transactionflow diagnostics user session monitoring unique users continuous delivery configuration alerting NGINX splitting business transaction client 6.3 installation chart database scheduler apache mobileapp RUM php dashlet azure purepath plugins agent 7.1 appmonsaas messagebroker nodejs 6.2 incidents android sensor performance warehouse
  • Forums
  • Public Forums
    • Community Connect
    • Dynatrace
      • Dynatrace Open Q&A
    • Application Monitoring & UEM
      • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
    • Network Application Monitoring
      • NAM Open Q&A
      • Enterprise Synthetic Monitoring
    • Synthetic Classic
      • Synthetic Classic Open Q&A