Hot Sensor Placement on IBM WebSphere 8.0

Question

Question by Jan S. · Jan 31, 2013 at 08:24 AM ·

Hot Sensor Placement on IBM WebSphere 8.0

Hello,

We recently upgraded form WebSphere 6 to 8 and where expecting to have support for 'hot sensor placement'. We where told during our training session that this would be the case. However, when I look at our newly deployed agents they are not indicating support for hot sensor placement.

Are we missing something here to get this working?

thanks!

0

10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded

Attachments: Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

Answer 1 · 2013-01-31T09:05:22Z

Answer by Jan S. · Jan 31, 2013 at 09:05 AM

Hi,

Great. Just tried it but I assume we will need to restart the JVM's before it will work?

I just turned the settings to always on but when performing the hot sensor placement it is still giving me:

skipped, because the agent was started with the profiling interface or doesn't possess the required VM capability

thanks!

0 Show 1 · Share

10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded

Attachments: Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

Roman S. · Jan 31, 2013 at 09:08 AM 0

Share

Yes, you will need to restart the JVMs before this takes effect.

Best, Roman

Answer 2 · 2013-01-31T08:59:49Z

Answer by Roman S. · Jan 31, 2013 at 08:59 AM

Hi Jan,

You will have to turn HSP on manually for it to work on IBM JVMs. Go to the advanced setting in the agent mapping tab of your system profile, change the option for HSP to always on and it should work.

Best, Roman

0 · Share

10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded

Attachments: Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

Hot Sensor Placement on IBM WebSphere 8.0

2 Replies

Join the conversation!

NAM 2019 SP3 is available

LIVE WEBINAR

Follow this Question

Forum Tags