• Forums
    • Public Forums
      • Community Connect
      • Dynatrace
        • Dynatrace Open Q&A
      • Application Monitoring & UEM
        • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
      • Network Application Monitoring
        • NAM Open Q&A
  • Home /
  • Public Forums /
  • Application Monitoring & UEM /
  • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A /
avatar image
Question by Renato P. · May 09, 2014 at 04:44 AM ·

Difference between Failure Rate - "Show Errors" on Transaction flow and the errors dashlet after drilling down

Guys,

 

A customer is asking me the difference between the number of errors/transactions failed on the you hoverover the mouse on transaction flow dashlet and the number of errors that is possible to see after drilling down. Because in his mind, he should be able to see the same number (28) in both dashlets if he is drilling down.

I have explained him like the following link: https://community.compuwareapm.com/community/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=DOCDT55&title=Transaction+Flow#TransactionFlow-WorkingwithTransactionFlow

But he seems not to understand. Any of you have a short and clean explanation that could help me out?

 

Basically the difference the number between previously image to the next one

 

 

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

2 Replies

  • Sort: 
  • Most voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
avatar image

Answer by Renato P. · May 13, 2014 at 03:53 AM

Make sense your explanation, but should not it show me only the 28 errors from the previously dashboard?

 

Because customer was kind of lost when drilling down and asked why dynaTrace does not specify/show me the 28 only. So would be easier on focusing on the affected transactions.

make sense my thoughts?

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

avatar image

Answer by Andreas G. · May 12, 2014 at 01:25 PM

Hi

The number in the transaction flow should show the errors detected on that particular Tier (=Agent). When you drill to the Errors Dashlet you will see the Errors as identified along the full end-to-end transaction. Thats where the difference comes in. So - it could be that you "only" have 28 errors on your .NET Tier but that there are a total of 1070 PurePaths (=Affected Transactions) impacted by errors that are idnetified along all tiers involved in these purepaths.

Makes sense?

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

How to get started

First steps in the forum
Read Community User Guide
Best practices of using forum

NAM 2019 SP5 is available


Check the RHEL support added in the latest NAM service pack.

Learn more

LIVE WEBINAR

"Performance Clinic - Monitoring as a Self Service with Dynatrace"


JANUARY 15, 3:00 PM GMT / 10:00 AM ET

Register here

Follow this Question

Answers Answers and Comments

No one has followed this question yet.

Forum Tags

dotnet mobile monitoring load iis 6.5 kubernetes mainframe rest api dashboard framework 7.0 appmon 7 health monitoring adk log monitoring services auto-detection uem webserver test automation license web performance monitoring ios nam probe collector migration mq web services knowledge sharing reports window java hybris javascript appmon sensors good to know extensions search 6.3+ server documentation easytravel web dashboard kibana system profile purelytics docker splunk 6.1 process groups account 7.2 rest dynatrace saas spa guardian appmon administration production user actions postgresql upgrade oneagent measures security Dynatrace Managed transactionflow technologies diagnostics user session monitoring unique users continuous delivery sharing configuration alerting NGINX splitting business transaction client 6.3 installation database scheduler apache mobileapp RUM php dashlet azure purepath agent 7.1 appmonsaas messagebroker nodejs 6.2 android sensor performance warehouse
  • Forums
  • Public Forums
    • Community Connect
    • Dynatrace
      • Dynatrace Open Q&A
    • Application Monitoring & UEM
      • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
    • Network Application Monitoring
      • NAM Open Q&A