• Forums
    • Public Forums
      • Community Connect
      • Dynatrace
        • Dynatrace Open Q&A
      • Application Monitoring & UEM
        • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
      • Network Application Monitoring
        • NAM Open Q&A
  • Home /
  • Public Forums /
  • Application Monitoring & UEM /
  • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A /
avatar image
Question by Sreerag M. · Apr 08, 2015 at 02:39 AM ·

Transaction flow - .Net tier response time contribution is empty

In one of our .net application instrumented with Dynatrace the .Net tier in transaction flow is showing empty contribution.

 

Below is the transaction floe for one single purepath.

 

The 'dotNet_FrontEnd' tier response time contribution is showing empty.

Also the web server contribution is almost equal to the total response time of the purepath

Could this be an issue with correlating events for purepaths?

Our DT version is 6.1.0.8054

-Sreerag

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

3 Replies

  • Sort: 
  • Most voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
avatar image

Answer by Andreas G. · Apr 08, 2015 at 04:32 AM

Would be interesting to see the PurePath. Might it be corrupted?

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

avatar image

Answer by Sreerag M. · Apr 08, 2015 at 12:40 PM

Hi Andi,

The purepaths have green status. There are many purepaths that show this behavior. 

I have uploaded one purepaths on the support ticket.

-Sreerag

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 0 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

avatar image

Answer by Christian S. · Apr 09, 2015 at 01:53 AM

hi Sreerag,

just had a short look at your Session. based on the PurePath it's pretty clear why the Transaction Flow looks like it does: because the synchronous call back to the Web Server "steals" the time away from the .NET tier resulting in some quite weird timings in this PurePath.

however, the interesting question now is what this synchronous call back to the Web Server is all about.
that should be clarified in the course of the SUP ticket.

best,
Christian 

Comment

People who like this

0 Show 2 · Share
10 |2000000 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 10 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 50.0 MiB each and 250.0 MiB total.

avatar image Sreerag M. · Apr 09, 2015 at 01:56 AM 0
Share

Thanks for looking into this Christian, We also were wondering what is that call back to web server. We are working with App team to try find out more on the expected request flow.

-Sreerag

avatar image Sreerag M. · Apr 10, 2015 at 04:45 AM 0
Share

Here are the technologies we use in the application

FrontEnd (HTML5, AngularJS, Modernizer)

BackEnd (WebAPI, MVC, IOC Framework)

the use of web API answers why there is an additional call to the web server layer.

-Sreerag

How to get started

First steps in the forum
Read Community User Guide
Best practices of using forum

NAM 2019 SP5 is available


Check the RHEL support added in the latest NAM service pack.

Learn more

LIVE WEBINAR

"Performance Clinic - Monitoring as a Self Service with Dynatrace"


JANUARY 15, 3:00 PM GMT / 10:00 AM ET

Register here

Follow this Question

Answers Answers and Comments

2 People are following this question.

avatar image avatar image

Forum Tags

dotnet mobile monitoring load iis 6.5 kubernetes mainframe rest api dashboard framework 7.0 appmon 7 health monitoring adk log monitoring services auto-detection uem webserver test automation license web performance monitoring ios nam probe collector migration mq web services knowledge sharing reports window java hybris javascript appmon sensors good to know extensions search 6.3+ server documentation easytravel web dashboard kibana system profile purelytics docker splunk 6.1 process groups account 7.2 rest dynatrace saas spa guardian appmon administration production user actions postgresql upgrade oneagent measures security Dynatrace Managed transactionflow technologies diagnostics user session monitoring unique users continuous delivery sharing configuration alerting NGINX splitting business transaction client 6.3 installation database scheduler apache mobileapp RUM php dashlet azure purepath agent 7.1 appmonsaas messagebroker nodejs 6.2 android sensor performance warehouse
  • Forums
  • Public Forums
    • Community Connect
    • Dynatrace
      • Dynatrace Open Q&A
    • Application Monitoring & UEM
      • AppMon & UEM Open Q&A
    • Network Application Monitoring
      • NAM Open Q&A